I don't know, guys. This one is a bit of a puzzler for me. The story is simply a vacation experience with a father and daughter who spend time together, love each other, and there is very little drama. We gather that there is something that the father is going through, though it is never shared with us. The vast majority of the film is just scenes from a vacation, with a lot of moments where you are wondering, is something terrible about to happen? Nope, nothing significant happens at all. It's just slightly more interesting than someone taking you through their vacation videos and photos.
Now, if you do any reading about this movie, you learn that the daughter is attempting to, as an adult 20 years later, learn more about her father, trying to identify which of her memories from the vacation are real and which are not, and exploring "the father she never really knew" through the lens of this experience. The problem is, if you have to get all of that from reading about the film and not at all from the film, then it has missed the mark. There are tiny moments that I would guess last less than 5 total minutes in the movie hinting at confusion and suggesting that this is all memory, but not enough to make clear this film as a flashback.
I can't even say the movie was confusing but the performance was remarkable. Ok, it was fine (and one could argue that Mescal's character is actually in a supporting role) but hardly Oscar nomination worthy.
No comments:
Post a Comment